The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched at 7.9 and 12.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 7.9 and 12.7.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose QvQ-72B-Preview

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
7.9
#286
12.7
#254
8.2
#279
12.8
#245
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
QvQ-72B-Preview
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
9.6#254
7.6#264
6.3#150
9.2#133
9.6#121
12.1#109
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for QvQ-72B-Preview · 30 for Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

2 shared

QvQ-72B-Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMMU), while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MathVision).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.4B diff

QvQ-72B-Preview has 1.4B more parameters than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct, making it 1.9% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QvQ-72B-Preview
73.4Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
72.0Bparameters
73.4B
QvQ-72B-Preview
72.0B
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

QvQ-72B-Preview is licensed under Qwen, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct uses tongyi-qianwen.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Qwen

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

QvQ-72B-Preview was released on 2024-12-25, while Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 1 month newer than QvQ-72B-Preview.

QvQ-72B-Preview

Dec 25, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.7 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

QvQ-72B-Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about QvQ-72B-Preview vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct.

Which is better, QvQ-72B-Preview or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 7.9 and 12.7. QvQ-72B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does QvQ-72B-Preview compare to Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct in benchmarks?

QvQ-72B-Preview scores MathVista: 71.4%, MMMU: 70.3%, MathVision: 35.9%, OlympiadBench: 20.4%. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct scores DocVQA: 96.4%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.7%, ChartQA: 89.5%, OCRBench: 88.5%, AI2D: 88.4%.

What are the main differences between QvQ-72B-Preview and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (7.9 vs 12.7), licensing (Qwen vs tongyi-qianwen). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.