The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 3.8 to -3.2.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 3.8 to -3.2, ranking #314 overall.

In the 10 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 3.8 and ranks #314 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 10 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.8
#314
-3.2
#351
3.3
#309
-3.2
#343
3.9
#222
6.5
#197
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 10
2 of 10
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
10.6#252
-2.4#312
5.0#172
-5.9#218
5.7#156
-7.2#204
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct · 19 for Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

10 shared

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct outperforms in 8 benchmarks (ARC-C, GSM8k, MATH, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, TheoremQA, TruthfulQA), while Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is better at 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MBPP).

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

7.7B diff

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct has 7.7B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct, making it 110.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
7.0Bparameters
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2024-09-19.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 3.8 to -3.2. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5 14B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%. Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct scores HumanEval: 88.4%, GSM8k: 83.9%, MBPP: 83.5%, HellaSwag: 76.8%, Winogrande: 72.9%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen2.5-Coder 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.8 vs -3.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.