The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 9.7 to 3.8.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 9.7 to 3.8, ranking #267 overall.

In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct wins 5; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

  • overall performance matters — it scores 9.7 and ranks #267 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 5 of 6 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.8
#305
9.7
#267
3.3
#300
8.4
#272
3.9
#213
12.4
#147
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 6
5 of 6
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
10.6#250
11.5#239
5.0#171
6.5#161
5.7#153
6.5#145
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct · 28 for Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

6 shared

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MBPP, MMLU-Pro).

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

18.8B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct has 18.8B more parameters than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct, making it 127.9% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
33.5Bparameters
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
33.5B
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct was released on 2025-02-28.

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is 5 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

Feb 28, 2025

1.5 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 9.7 to 3.8. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5 14B Instruct compare to Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%. Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct scores DocVQA: 94.8%, Android Control Low_EM: 93.3%, HumanEval: 91.5%, ScreenSpot: 88.5%, MBPP: 84.0%.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.8 vs 9.7), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.