The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B leads the LLM Stats Score 38.9 to 3.8.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 38.9 to 3.8, ranking #60 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 38.9 and ranks #60 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.8
#293
38.9
#60
3.2
#290
38.8
#57
4.0
#206
22.9
#73
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.60 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.60 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
10.7#243
36.6#35
5.4#164
38.4#2
6.0#145
38.4#4
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct · 38 for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

3 shared

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux).

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

382.3B diff

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 382.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct, making it 2600.7% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
397.0Bparameters
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
397.0B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is 17 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

6 months ago

1.4yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B leads the LLM Stats Score 38.9 to 3.8. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5 14B Instruct compare to Qwen3.5-397B-A17B in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3.5-397B-A17B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.8 vs 38.9), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.