The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 3.8.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 3.8, ranking #11 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8 Max wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3.8 Max

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.9 and ranks #11 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.8
#305
51.9
#11
3.3
#300
50.6
#11
3.9
#213
39.6
#14
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
$1.65 / M
Output price
— / M
$4.95 / M
Context window
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Qwen3.8 Max
10.6#249
33.8#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct · 42 for Qwen3.8 Max

1 shared

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8 Max is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Qwen3.8 Max significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2385.3B diff

Qwen3.8 Max has 2385.3B more parameters than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct, making it 16226.5% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
14.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
2.4Tparameters
14.7B
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
2400.0B
Qwen3.8 Max

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Max specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Max specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Max
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.8 Max supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 14B Instruct does not.

Qwen3.8 Max can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Max

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8 Max uses Qwen3.8-Max License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8-Max License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3.8 Max was released on 2026-08-02.

Qwen3.8 Max is 23 months newer than Qwen2.5 14B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

2.0 years ago

Qwen3.8 Max

Aug 2, 2026

1 months ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Max side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Max
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 14B Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 14B Instruct or Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 3.8. Qwen2.5 14B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8 Max is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2.5 14B Instruct compare to Qwen3.8 Max in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct scores GSM8k: 94.8%, HumanEval: 83.5%, MBPP: 82.0%, MATH: 80.0%, MMLU-Redux: 80.0%. Qwen3.8 Max scores PaperBench: 93.0%, MRCR v2 (8-needle): 92.9%, GPQA: 92.6%, VideoMME w sub.: 90.4%, RealWorldQA: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen2.5 14B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3.8 Max supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 14B Instruct and Qwen3.8 Max?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.8 vs 51.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen3.8-Max License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.