Model Comparison

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen2.5 72B Instruct if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.35/M input and $0.40/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 4 of 4 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

39.7B diff

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 39.7B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 120.3% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
72.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
72.7B
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen2.5 72B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is licensed under Qwen, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 12 months newer than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.7 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

8 months ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher GPQA score (73.1% vs 49.0%)
Higher IFEval score (87.8% vs 84.1%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.1% vs 71.1%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (91.9% vs 86.8%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5 72B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen2.5 72B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores GSM8k: 95.8%, MT-Bench: 93.5%, MBPP: 88.2%, MMLU-Redux: 86.8%, HumanEval: 86.6%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct supports 131K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5 72B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Qwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.