Model Comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 30B A3B is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 30B A3B is more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Input tokens$0.09

Output tokens$0.09

Best providerLambda

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input tokens$0.10

Output tokens$0.30

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1.5B diff

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct has 1.5B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 4.9% larger.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

32.0Bparameters

Qwen3 30B A3B

30.5Bparameters

32.0B

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

30.5B

Qwen3 30B A3B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Fri Apr 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3 30B A3B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 30B A3B is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 30B A3B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks. Qwen3 30B A3B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Fireworks.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Lambda

Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.09/1M

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

Hyperbolic

Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

Qwen3 30B A3B

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M

Novita

Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M

Fireworks

Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher LiveCodeBench score (62.6% vs 31.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct	Qwen3 30B A3B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Qwen3 30B A3B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 30B A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%. Qwen3 30B A3B scores Arena Hard: 91.0%, AIME 2024: 80.4%, LiveBench: 74.3%, Multi-IF: 72.2%, AIME 2025: 70.9%.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output via lambda. Qwen3 30B A3B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 30B A3B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Key differences include input pricing ($0.09 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 30B A3B

Performance Benchmarks

Arena Performance

Pricing Analysis

Model Size

Context Window

License

Release Timeline

Knowledge Cutoff

Provider Availability

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen3 30B A3B

Outputs Comparison

Key Takeaways

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Qwen3 30B A3B

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Which is better, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct or Qwen3 30B A3B?

How does Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct compare to Qwen3 30B A3B in benchmarks?

Is Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B?

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?

What are the main differences between Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct and Qwen3 30B A3B?