Model Comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 1.7x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 32B is better at 1 benchmark (LiveCodeBench).

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

CallingBox

Done comparing? Ship the phone agent.

One API for outbound and inbound calls.

$0.05 /min all-in7 lines of code

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than Qwen3 32B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct ($0.09/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than Qwen3 32B ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3 32B is more expensive than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.09
Best providerLambda
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

800.0M diff

Qwen3 32B has 0.8B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct, making it 2.5% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
32.8Bparameters
32.0B
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
32.8B
Qwen3 32B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 128,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 128,000 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Thu Apr 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19, while Qwen3 32B was released on 2025-04-29.

Qwen3 32B is 7 months newer than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.6 years ago

Qwen3 32B

Apr 29, 2025

11 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is available from Lambda, DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks. Qwen3 32B is available from DeepInfra, Novita, Sambanova.

Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct

lambda logo
Lambda
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.09/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.18/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M

Qwen3 32B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.44/1M
sambanova logo
Sambanova
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.80/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 32B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Higher LiveCodeBench score (65.7% vs 31.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct vs Qwen3 32B

Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct scores HumanEval: 92.7%, GSM8k: 91.1%, MBPP: 90.2%, HellaSwag: 83.0%, Winogrande: 80.8%. Qwen3 32B scores Arena Hard: 93.8%, AIME 2024: 81.4%, LiveBench: 74.9%, MultiLF: 73.0%, AIME 2025: 72.9%.
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct costs $0.09/M input and $0.09/M output via lambda. Qwen3 32B costs $0.10/M input and $0.30/M output via deepinfra.
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 32B supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include input pricing ($0.09 vs $0.10/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.