The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 26.7 to 14.3.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the overall LLM Stats Score 26.7 to 14.3, ranking #154 overall.

In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking wins 6; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

  • overall performance matters — it scores 26.7 and ranks #154 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 6 of 7 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
14.3
#243
26.7
#154
11.6
#258
26.9
#148
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 7
6 of 7
Input price
— / M
$0.45 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.49 / M
Context window
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
10.5#124
18.0#84
11.6#114
20.1#73
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct · 67 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

7 shared

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (OCRBench), while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is better at 5 benchmarks (InfoVQAtest, MathVista-Mini, MMMU-Pro, MMMUval, RealWorldQA).

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

162.6B diff

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has 162.6B more parameters than Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct, making it 221.5% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
73.4Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
236.0Bparameters
73.4B
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
236.0B
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is licensed under tongyi-qianwen, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

tongyi-qianwen

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct was released on 2024-08-29, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is 13 months newer than Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct.

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Aug 29, 2024

2.1 years ago

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

1.0 years ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-06-30, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct's training data extends to 2023-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking's cutoff date.

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct

Jun 2023

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking.

Which is better, Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking leads the LLM Stats Score 26.7 to 14.3. Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking in benchmarks?

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 96.5%, VCR_en_easy: 91.9%, ChartQA: 88.3%, OCRBench: 87.7%, MMBench: 86.5%. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking scores ZebraLogic: 97.3%, DocVQAtest: 96.5%, ScreenSpot: 95.4%, CountBench: 93.7%, MMLU-Redux: 93.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (14.3 vs 26.7), licensing (tongyi-qianwen vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.