Model Comparison

Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3 VL 32B ThinkingWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking — which is better?

Qwen3 235B A22B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3 235B A22B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Include, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SuperGPQA). Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen3 235B A22B if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 7 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

7 benchmarks

Qwen3 235B A22B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is better at 7 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Include, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-Redux, SuperGPQA).

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Jul 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

202.0B diff

Qwen3 235B A22B has 202.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking, making it 612.1% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
235.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
235.0B
Qwen3 235B A22B
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 235B A22B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Jul 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3 235B A22B does not.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3 235B A22B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3 235B A22B was released on 2025-04-29, while Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is 5 months newer than Qwen3 235B A22B.

Qwen3 235B A22B

Apr 29, 2025

1.2 years ago

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 235B A22B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2025 score (83.7% vs 81.5%)
Higher GPQA score (73.1% vs 47.5%)
Higher Include score (76.3% vs 73.5%)
Higher MMLU score (88.7% vs 87.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (82.1% vs 68.2%)
Higher MMLU-Redux score (91.9% vs 87.4%)
Higher SuperGPQA score (59.0% vs 44.1%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3 235B A22B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3 235B A22B vs Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Which is better, Qwen3 235B A22B or Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3 235B A22B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3 235B A22B compare to Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking in benchmarks?

Qwen3 235B A22B scores Arena Hard: 95.6%, GSM8k: 94.4%, BBH: 88.9%, MMLU: 87.8%, MMLU-Redux: 87.4%. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Qwen3 235B A22B supports 128K tokens and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3 235B A22B and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.