Model Comparison
Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Qwen3 30B A3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 32B is better at 6 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, Arena Hard, BFCL, LiveBench, LiveCodeBench).
Qwen3 32B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
Cost data unavailable.
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3 32B has 2.3B more parameters than Qwen3 30B A3B, making it 7.5% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Only Qwen3 32B specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Qwen3 32B specifies output context (128,000 tokens).
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Both models were released on 2025-04-29.
They likely represent similar generations of model development.
Apr 29, 2025
11 months ago
Apr 29, 2025
11 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Qwen3 30B A3B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B
View detailsAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Detailed Comparison
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3 30B A3B vs Qwen3 32B