Model Comparison

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B InstructWhich is better in 2026?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct — which is better?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BFCL-v3), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BFCL-v3), while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

449.0B diff

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct has 449.0B more parameters than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct, making it 1448.4% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
480.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
31.0Bparameters
480.0B
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
31.0B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct does not.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct was released on 2025-01-31, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 8 months newer than Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct.

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct

Jan 31, 2025

1.4 years ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

9 months ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher BFCL-v3 score (68.7% vs 66.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct scores TAU-bench Retail: 77.5%, SWE-Bench Verified: 69.6%, BFCL-v3: 68.7%, Aider-Polyglot: 61.8%, TAU-bench Airline: 60.0%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3-Coder 480B A35B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.