Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Solar Mini 4
Qwen3 Max Thinking and Solar Mini 4 are closely matched at 32.8 and 31.9 on the LLM Stats Score. Solar Mini 4 is 13.7x cheaper per token.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Upstage · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3 Max Thinking and Solar Mini 4 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 32.8 and 31.9.
The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.
On price, Solar Mini 4 is roughly 13.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Solar Mini 4 also accepts a larger context window (524,288 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Qwen3 Max Thinking
- you want predictable pricing at $1.20/M input and $6.00/M output
Choose Solar Mini 4
- cost matters — it's about 13.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 524,288 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
34 reported for Qwen3 Max Thinking · 6 for Solar Mini 4
Qwen3 Max Thinking outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam (no tools, text-only)), while Solar Mini 4 is better at 1 benchmark (AA-LCR).
Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3 Max Thinking ($1.20/1M tokens) is 12.0x more expensive than Solar Mini 4 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3 Max Thinking ($6.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x more expensive than Solar Mini 4 ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 Max Thinking is more expensive than Solar Mini 4.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3 Max Thinking has 965.0B more parameters than Solar Mini 4, making it 2757.1% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Solar Mini 4 accepts 524,288 input tokens compared to Qwen3 Max Thinking's 256,000 tokens. Qwen3 Max Thinking can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Solar Mini 4 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3 Max Thinking was released on 2026-02-13, while Solar Mini 4 was released on 2026-09-22.
Solar Mini 4 is 7 months newer than Qwen3 Max Thinking.
Feb 13, 2026
7 months ago
Sep 22, 2026
2 weeks ago
7mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Solar Mini 4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-02-01, while Qwen3 Max Thinking's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Solar Mini 4's training data extends to 2026-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 Max Thinking's cutoff date.
—
Feb 2026
Provider Availability
Qwen3 Max Thinking is available from DeepInfra. Solar Mini 4 is available from Upstage.
Qwen3 Max Thinking
Solar Mini 4
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Qwen3 Max Thinking and Solar Mini 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3 Max Thinking vs Solar Mini 4.