Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs QwQ-32B-Preview
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the LLM Stats Score 24.7 to 9.0. QwQ-32B-Preview is 2.3x cheaper per token.
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.7 to 9.0, ranking #161 overall.
On price, QwQ-32B-Preview is roughly 2.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
- overall performance matters — it scores 24.7 and ranks #161 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2025
Choose QwQ-32B-Preview
- cost matters — it's about 2.3x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
50 reported for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct · 4 for QwQ-32B-Preview
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and QwQ-32B-Previewdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.20/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.15/1M tokens).
For output processing, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct ($0.88/1M tokens) is 4.4x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.20/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct has 203.5B more parameters than QwQ-32B-Preview, making it 626.2% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to QwQ-32B-Preview's 32,768 tokens. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while QwQ-32B-Preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B-Preview does not.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
QwQ-32B-Preview
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.
Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is 10 months newer than QwQ-32B-Preview.
Sep 22, 2025
11 months ago
9mo newerNov 28, 2024
1.8 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
QwQ-32B-Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm QwQ-32B-Preview's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's cutoff date.
—
Nov 2024
Provider Availability
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Novita. QwQ-32B-Preview is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
QwQ-32B-Preview
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and QwQ-32B-Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs QwQ-32B-Preview.