The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking vs Step3-VL-10B

Step3-VL-10B leads the LLM Stats Score 26.1 to 23.5.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · StepFun · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Step3-VL-10B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 26.1 to 23.5, ranking #143 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Step3-VL-10B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

Choose Step3-VL-10B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 26.1 and ranks #143 on LLM Stats
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Step3-VL-10B
StepFun
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
23.5
#166
26.1
#143
Reasoning
24.7
#145
25.9
#140
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
Step3-VL-10B
Math
25.5#103
23.9#121
Vision
17.5#80
17.1#81
Multimodal
20.0#67
20.9#63
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

47 reported for Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking · 6 for Step3-VL-10B

2 shared

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Step3-VL-10B is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2025, MathVision).

Step3-VL-10B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

23.0B diff

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking has 23.0B more parameters than Step3-VL-10B, making it 230.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
33.0Bparameters
StepFun
Step3-VL-10B
10.0Bparameters
33.0B
Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
10.0B
Step3-VL-10B

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Step3-VL-10B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Step3-VL-10B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Step3-VL-10B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking was released on 2025-09-22, while Step3-VL-10B was released on 2026-01-15.

Step3-VL-10B is 4 months newer than Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking

Sep 22, 2025

11 months ago

Step3-VL-10B

Jan 15, 2026

7 months ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Step3-VL-10B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking
✓ Preferred
Step3-VL-10B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking vs Step3-VL-10B.

Which is better, Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking or Step3-VL-10B?

Step3-VL-10B leads the LLM Stats Score 26.1 to 23.5. Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Step3-VL-10B is made by StepFun. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking compare to Step3-VL-10B in benchmarks?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking scores DocVQAtest: 96.1%, ScreenSpot: 95.7%, MMLU-Redux: 91.9%, MMBench-V1.1: 90.8%, CharXiv-D: 90.2%. Step3-VL-10B scores MMBench: 91.8%, AIME 2025: 87.7%, MathVista: 84.0%, MMMU: 78.1%, MathVision: 70.8%.

What are the main differences between Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Step3-VL-10B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (23.5 vs 26.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking and Step3-VL-10B?

Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Step3-VL-10B is developed by StepFun.

Related comparisons