Model Comparison

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)Which is better in 2026?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 6.8x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) — which is better?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) (by NVIDIA) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 12 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, Multi-Challenge, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is better at 1 benchmark (WMT24++). Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is roughly 6.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Choose Qwen3.5-397B-A17B if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 12 of 13 shared benchmarks

Choose Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) if…

  • cost matters — it's about 6.8x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2026
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

13 benchmarks

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 12 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, HMMT 2025, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX, Multi-Challenge, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.0), while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is better at 1 benchmark (WMT24++).

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($0.60/1M tokens) is 6.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B ($3.60/1M tokens) is 7.2x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Jun 14 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input tokens$0.60
Output tokens$3.60
Best providerNovita
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.50
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

277.0B diff

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 277.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B), making it 230.8% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
397.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
120.0Bparameters
397.0B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
120.0B
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is limited to 64,000 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Jun 14 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) does not.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) was released on 2026-03-11.

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 1 month newer than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

3 months ago

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Mar 11, 2026

3 months ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.5-397B-A17B's cutoff date.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

—

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Jun 2025

Provider Availability

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is available from Novita. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.60/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.60/1M

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AA-LCR score (68.7% vs 58.3%)
Higher BrowseComp score (69.0% vs 31.3%)
Higher GPQA score (88.4% vs 82.7%)
Higher HMMT 2025 score (94.8% vs 94.7%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (28.7% vs 22.8%)
Higher IFBench score (76.5% vs 72.6%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (87.8% vs 83.7%)
Higher MMLU-ProX score (84.7% vs 79.4%)
Higher Multi-Challenge score (67.6% vs 55.2%)
Higher SWE-bench Multilingual score (69.3% vs 45.8%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (76.4% vs 53.7%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (52.5% vs 31.0%)
NVIDIA
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher WMT24++ score (86.7% vs 78.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).

Which is better, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.5-397B-A17B compare to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) scores HMMT 2025: 94.7%, RULER: 91.8%, AIME 2025: 90.2%, WMT24++: 86.7%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%.

Is Qwen3.5-397B-A17B cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 6.0x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B costs $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output via novita. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.10/M input and $0.50/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.60 vs $0.10/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons