The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, SWE-bench Multilingual, Toolathlon). Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.60/M input and $3.60/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 6 of 6 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
0 of 6
6 of 6
Input price
$0.60 / M
— / M
Output price
$3.60 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
Released
Feb 2026
Aug 2026
License
Apache 2.0
Qwen Community License 1.0

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 6 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, LiveCodeBench v6, SWE-bench Multilingual, Toolathlon).

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

272.0B diff

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B has 272.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8-Flash-Next, making it 217.6% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
397.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
397.0B
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Qwen3.5-397B-A17B specifies output context (64,000 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
Input262,144 tokens
Output64,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Aug 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B was released on 2026-02-16, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next was released on 2026-08-26.

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is 6 months newer than Qwen3.5-397B-A17B.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B

Feb 16, 2026

6 months ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

1 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.5-397B-A17B vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Qwen3.5-397B-A17B or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.5-397B-A17B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.5-397B-A17B compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B scores MMLU-Redux: 94.9%, HMMT 2025: 94.8%, C-Eval: 93.0%, HMMT25: 92.7%, IFEval: 92.6%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.5-397B-A17B supports 262K tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.5-397B-A17B and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.