Model Comparison

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Gemini 3.5 FlashWhich is better in 2026?

Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash — which is better?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) and Gemini 3.5 Flash (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.5 Flash is better at 8 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon). Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Qwen3.6-35B-A3B if…

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 8 of 8 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

8 benchmarks

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 3.5 Flash is better at 8 benchmarks (CharXiv-R, GDPval-AA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, MMMU-Pro, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.0, Toolathlon).

Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 3.5 Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 3.5 Flash specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Gemini 3.5 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 3.5 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B was released on 2026-04-16, while Gemini 3.5 Flash was released on 2026-05-19.

Gemini 3.5 Flash is 1 month newer than Qwen3.6-35B-A3B.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

Apr 16, 2026

3 months ago

Gemini 3.5 Flash

May 19, 2026

1 months ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-01-31, while Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash's training data extends to 2026-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3.6-35B-A3B's cutoff date.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

—

Gemini 3.5 Flash

Jan 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Higher CharXiv-R score (84.2% vs 78.0%)
Higher GDPval-AA score (45.7% vs 35.2%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (40.2% vs 21.4%)
Higher MCP Atlas score (83.6% vs 62.8%)
Higher MMMU-Pro score (83.6% vs 75.3%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (55.1% vs 49.5%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.0 score (76.2% vs 51.5%)
Higher Toolathlon score (56.5% vs 26.9%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Gemini 3.5 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.6-35B-A3B
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.6-35B-A3B vs Gemini 3.5 Flash.

Which is better, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B or Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Gemini 3.5 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Gemini 3.5 Flash is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Qwen3.6-35B-A3B compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash in benchmarks?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B scores MMLU-Redux: 93.3%, MMBench-V1.1: 92.8%, AI2D: 92.7%, AIME 2026: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 92.0%. Gemini 3.5 Flash scores CharXiv-R: 84.2%, MCP Atlas: 83.6%, MMMU-Pro: 83.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 78.4%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 76.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemini 3.5 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Key differences include licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.6-35B-A3B and Gemini 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.6-35B-A3B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Gemini 3.5 Flash is developed by Google.

Related comparisons