The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3.7-Plus vs Solar Pro 4

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 36.0. Solar Pro 4 is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Upstage · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 36.0, ranking #36 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.7-Plus wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Solar Pro 4 is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Qwen3.7-Plus also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3.7-Plus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.3 and ranks #36 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose Solar Pro 4

  • cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Qwen3.7-Plus
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Solar Pro 4
Upstage
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.3
#36
36.0
#72
Reasoning
43.6
#33
35.6
#71
Coding
32.5
#41
22.1
#73
Agents
26.1
#39
13.8
#84
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.32 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$1.28 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,000,000
524,288

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Qwen3.7-Plus
Solar Pro 4
Math
39.7#16
32.0#55
Tool use
24.3#33
15.3#81
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

70 reported for Qwen3.7-Plus · 9 for Solar Pro 4

3 shared

Qwen3.7-Plus outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro, SWE-Bench Verified), while Solar Pro 4 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Qwen3.7-Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Solar Pro 4 costs less

For input processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($0.32/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Qwen3.7-Plus ($1.28/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Solar Pro 4 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Qwen3.7-Plus is more expensive than Solar Pro 4.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input tokens$0.32
Output tokens$1.28
Best providerTogether
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerUnknown Organization
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Qwen3.7-Plus accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Solar Pro 4's 524,288 tokens. Solar Pro 4 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Qwen3.7-Plus is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.7-Plus
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Upstage
Solar Pro 4
Input524,288 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Aug 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen3.7-Plus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Solar Pro 4 does not.

Qwen3.7-Plus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Solar Pro 4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Qwen3.7-Plus

Proprietary

Closed source

Solar Pro 4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Qwen3.7-Plus was released on 2026-05-31, while Solar Pro 4 was released on 2026-08-06.

Solar Pro 4 is 2 months newer than Qwen3.7-Plus.

Qwen3.7-Plus

May 31, 2026

2 months ago

Solar Pro 4

Aug 6, 2026

3 weeks ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Qwen3.7-Plus is available from Together, Fireworks. Solar Pro 4 is available from Upstage.

Qwen3.7-Plus

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.32/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.28/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.60/1M

Solar Pro 4

upstage logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.7-Plus and Solar Pro 4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.7-Plus
✓ Preferred
Solar Pro 4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.7-Plus vs Solar Pro 4.

Which is better, Qwen3.7-Plus or Solar Pro 4?

Qwen3.7-Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 43.3 to 36.0. Qwen3.7-Plus is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Solar Pro 4 is made by Upstage. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3.7-Plus compare to Solar Pro 4 in benchmarks?

Qwen3.7-Plus scores IFEval: 94.6%, MMLU-Redux: 94.5%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.9%, MRCR v2: 91.7%, OmniDocBench 1.5: 91.4%. Solar Pro 4 scores AIME 2026: 95.3%, GPQA: 89.0%, LiveCodeBench: 87.8%, MMLU-Pro: 86.3%, AA-LCR: 71.0%.

Is Qwen3.7-Plus cheaper than Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4 is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. Qwen3.7-Plus costs $0.32/M input and $1.28/M output via together. Solar Pro 4 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via upstage.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.7-Plus and Solar Pro 4?

Qwen3.7-Plus supports 1.0M tokens and Solar Pro 4 supports 524K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.7-Plus and Solar Pro 4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.3 vs 36.0), context window (1.0M vs 524K), input pricing ($0.32 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Qwen3.7-Plus and Solar Pro 4?

Qwen3.7-Plus is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Solar Pro 4 is developed by Upstage.

Related comparisons