The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched at 49.6 and 49.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 49.6 and 49.7.

In the 22 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next wins 22; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $0.47/M output

Choose Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 22 of 22 exact shared results
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
49.6
#16
49.7
#15
49.2
#16
49.3
#15
36.6
#20
36.6
#18
35.5
#14
35.5
#13
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 22
22 of 22
Input price
$0.15 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.47 / M
— / M
Context window
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

5 shared
Index
Qwen3.8 Flash
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
32.6#55
32.7#54
34.4#13
34.4#12
31.6#10
31.6#9
36.2#8
36.2#7
16.4#2
16.4#1
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Qwen3.8 Flash · 22 for Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

22 shared

Qwen3.8 Flash outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is better at 0 benchmarks.

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

0.0M diff

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next has 0.0B more parameters than Qwen3.8 Flash, making it 0.0% larger.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
125.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
125.0Bparameters
125.0B
Qwen3.8 Flash
125.0B
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only Qwen3.8 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Qwen3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen3.8-Flash-Next uses Qwen Community License 1.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Qwen Community License 1.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Both models were released on 2026-08-26.

They likely represent similar generations of model development.

Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

5 days ago

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

Aug 26, 2026

5 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Qwen3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8-Flash-Next
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Qwen3.8 Flash vs Qwen3.8-Flash-Next.

Which is better, Qwen3.8 Flash or Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 49.6 and 49.7. Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Qwen3.8 Flash compare to Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in benchmarks?

Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%. Qwen3.8-Flash-Next scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Qwen3.8 Flash and Qwen3.8-Flash-Next?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (49.6 vs 49.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Qwen Community License 1.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.