Model Comparison

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM-5.2Which is better in 2026?

GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM-5.2 — which is better?

Seed 2.1 Turbo (by ByteDance) and GLM-5.2 (by Zhipu AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Seed 2.1 Turbo outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, Toolathlon), while GLM-5.2 is better at 7 benchmarks (DeepSWE, Humanity's Last Exam, NL2Repo, PostTrainBench, Program Bench, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1). GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Seed 2.1 Turbo if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2026

Choose GLM-5.2 if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 7 of 9 shared benchmarks
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

9 benchmarks

Seed 2.1 Turbo outperforms in 2 benchmarks (MCP Atlas, Toolathlon), while GLM-5.2 is better at 7 benchmarks (DeepSWE, Humanity's Last Exam, NL2Repo, PostTrainBench, Program Bench, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only GLM-5.2 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only GLM-5.2 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

ByteDance
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Jul 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Seed 2.1 Turbo supports multimodal inputs, whereas GLM-5.2 does not.

Seed 2.1 Turbo can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GLM-5.2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Seed 2.1 Turbo is licensed under a proprietary license, while GLM-5.2 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

GLM-5.2

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Seed 2.1 Turbo was released on 2026-06-24, while GLM-5.2 was released on 2026-06-16.

Seed 2.1 Turbo is 0 month newer than GLM-5.2.

Seed 2.1 Turbo

Jun 24, 2026

3 weeks ago

1w newer
GLM-5.2

Jun 16, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

ByteDance
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher MCP Atlas score (80.3% vs 76.8%)
Higher Toolathlon score (49.1% vs 48.2%)
Zhipu AI
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher DeepSWE score (46.2% vs 23.0%)
Higher Humanity's Last Exam score (54.7% vs 54.6%)
Higher NL2Repo score (48.9% vs 43.7%)
Higher PostTrainBench score (34.3% vs 18.3%)
Higher Program Bench score (63.7% vs 49.4%)
Higher SWE-Bench Pro score (62.1% vs 57.0%)
Higher Terminal-Bench 2.1 score (82.7% vs 67.6%)

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-5.2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Seed 2.1 Turbo
✓ Preferred
GLM-5.2
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
ByteDance
Seed 2.1 Turbo
Zhipu AI
GLM-5.2

FAQ

Common questions about Seed 2.1 Turbo vs GLM-5.2.

Which is better, Seed 2.1 Turbo or GLM-5.2?

GLM-5.2 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Seed 2.1 Turbo is made by ByteDance and GLM-5.2 is made by Zhipu AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Seed 2.1 Turbo compare to GLM-5.2 in benchmarks?

Seed 2.1 Turbo scores CharXiv-D: 94.6%, MathVision: 92.7%, MathVista: 90.5%, MathVerse: 89.2%, Video-MME: 89.0%. GLM-5.2 scores AIME 2026: 99.2%, HMMT 2025: 94.4%, HMMT Feb 26: 92.5%, GPQA: 91.2%, IMO-AnswerBench: 91.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-5.2?

Seed 2.1 Turbo supports an unknown number of tokens and GLM-5.2 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-5.2?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Seed 2.1 Turbo and GLM-5.2?

Seed 2.1 Turbo is developed by ByteDance and GLM-5.2 is developed by Zhipu AI.

Related comparisons