BLINK
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on BLINK
BLINK Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ByteDance | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | ByteDance | — | — | — | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | — | — | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 13 | Microsoft | 6B | — | — |
What is BLINK?
BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive. A benchmark for multimodal language models focusing on core visual perception abilities. Reformats 14 classic computer vision tasks into 3,807 multiple-choice questions paired with single or multiple images and visual prompting. Tasks include relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, multi-view reasoning, counting, object localization, and spatial reasoning that humans can solve 'within a blink'.
BLINK is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, reasoning, spatial reasoning, 3d, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 13 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.7, with the leader at 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning, best AI for spatial reasoning, best AI for 3d and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Current leaders
Seed 2.1 Pro from ByteDance currently leads the BLINK leaderboard with a score of 0.814 across 13 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- BLINK: Multimodal Large Language Models Can See but Not Perceive
- Authors
- Xingyu Fu, Yushi Hu, Bangzheng Li, Yu Feng, and 6 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2404.12390
Abstract
We introduce Blink, a new benchmark for multimodal language models (LLMs) that focuses on core visual perception abilities not found in other evaluations. Most of the Blink tasks can be solved by humans "within a blink" (e.g., relative depth estimation, visual correspondence, forensics detection, and multi-view reasoning). However, we find these perception-demanding tasks cast significant challenges for current multimodal LLMs because they resist mediation through natural language. Blink reformats 14 classic computer vision tasks into 3,807 multiple-choice questions, paired with single or multiple images and visual prompting. While humans get 95.70% accuracy on average, Blink is surprisingly challenging for existing multimodal LLMs: even the best-performing GPT-4V and Gemini achieve accuracies of 51.26% and 45.72%, only 13.17% and 7.63% higher than random guessing, indicating that such perception abilities have not "emerged" yet in recent multimodal LLMs. Our analysis also highlights that specialist CV models could solve these problems much better, suggesting potential pathways for future improvements. We believe Blink will stimulate the community to help multimodal LLMs catch up with human-level visual perception.
FAQ
Common questions about the BLINK benchmark and leaderboard.