CC-OCR

A comprehensive OCR benchmark for evaluating Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in literacy. Comprises four OCR-centric tracks: multi-scene text reading, multilingual text reading, document parsing, and key information extraction. Contains 39 subsets with 7,058 fully annotated images, 41% sourced from real applications. Tests capabilities including text grounding, multi-orientation text recognition, and detecting hallucination/repetition across diverse visual challenges.

Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the CC-OCR leaderboard with a score of 0.834 across 18 evaluated AI models.

PaperImplementation

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.6 Plus leads with 83.4%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct at 82.2% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.6-35B-A3B at 81.9%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on CC-OCR

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

CC-OCR Leaderboard

18 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
236B262K$0.30 / $1.49
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
236B262K$0.45 / $3.49
6
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
28B262K$0.60 / $3.60
7
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
8
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
8
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
31B
10
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
33B
11
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
9B262K$0.08 / $0.50
12
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
72B
13
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
8B
13
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
31B
15
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
34B
16
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
9B262K$0.18 / $2.09
17
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
4B262K$0.10 / $0.60
18
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
4B262K$0.10 / $1.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about CC-OCR.

What is the CC-OCR benchmark?

A comprehensive OCR benchmark for evaluating Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) in literacy. Comprises four OCR-centric tracks: multi-scene text reading, multilingual text reading, document parsing, and key information extraction. Contains 39 subsets with 7,058 fully annotated images, 41% sourced from real applications. Tests capabilities including text grounding, multi-orientation text recognition, and detecting hallucination/repetition across diverse visual challenges.

What is the CC-OCR leaderboard?

The CC-OCR leaderboard ranks 18 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3.6 Plus by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.834. The average score across all models is 0.796.

What is the highest CC-OCR score?

The highest CC-OCR score is 0.834, achieved by Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on CC-OCR?

18 models have been evaluated on the CC-OCR benchmark, with 0 verified results and 18 self-reported results.

Where can I find the CC-OCR paper?

The CC-OCR paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.02210. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

Where can I find the CC-OCR dataset?

What categories does CC-OCR cover?

CC-OCR is categorized under structured output, text-to-image, vision, and multimodal. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models with multilingual support.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all structured output
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
75 models
IFEval

Instruction-Following Evaluation (IFEval) benchmark for large language models, focusing on verifiable instructions with 25 types of instructions and around 500 prompts containing one or more verifiable constraints

structured output
63 models
MMMU

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

visionmultimodal
62 models
MMMU-Pro

A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.

visionmultimodal
49 models
CharXiv-R

CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.

visionmultimodal
36 models
MathVista

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

visionmultimodal
36 models