ChartQA
ChartQA is a large-scale benchmark comprising 9.6K human-written questions and 23.1K questions generated from human-written chart summaries, designed to evaluate models' abilities in visual and logical reasoning over charts.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet from Anthropic currently leads the ChartQA leaderboard with a score of 0.908 across 24 evaluated AI models.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads with 90.8%, followed by 
Llama 4 Maverick at 90.0% and 
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct at 89.5%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ChartQA
ChartQA Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | Meta | 400B | — | — | ||
| 3 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 4 |  Amazon | — | — | — | ||
| 5 | Meta | 109B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 7 |  Mistral AI | 124B | — | — | ||
| 8 | Mistral AI | 24B | — | — | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Amazon | — | — | — | ||
| 11 |  DeepSeek | 27B | — | — | ||
| 12 |  OpenAI | — | 128K | $2.50 / $10.00 | ||
| 13 | 90B | — | — | |||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 7B | — | — | ||
| 15 | DeepSeek | 16B | — | — | ||
| 16 | 11B | — | — | |||
| 17 |  Microsoft | 4B | — | — | ||
| 17 | Mistral AI | 12B | — | — | ||
| 19 | Microsoft | 6B | — | — | ||
| 20 | DeepSeek | 3B | — | — | ||
| 21 |  Google | 27B | — | — | ||
| 22 |  xAI | — | — | — | ||
| 23 | Google | 12B | — | — | ||
| 24 | Google | 4B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about ChartQA.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions