Finance Agent

Finance Agent is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on agentic financial analysis tasks, testing their ability to process financial data, perform calculations, and generate accurate analyses across various financial domains.

Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic currently leads the Finance Agent leaderboard with a score of 0.644 across 5 evaluated AI models.

AnthropicClaude Opus 4.7 leads with 64.4%, followed by AnthropicClaude Sonnet 4.6 at 63.3% and AnthropicClaude Opus 4.6 at 60.7%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Finance Agent

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

Finance Agent Leaderboard

5 models
ContextCostLicense
11.0M$5.00 / $25.00
2200K$3.00 / $15.00
31.0M$5.00 / $25.00
4
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.1M$5.00 / $30.00
5
OpenAI
OpenAI
1.0M$2.50 / $15.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about Finance Agent.

What is the Finance Agent benchmark?

Finance Agent is a benchmark for evaluating AI models on agentic financial analysis tasks, testing their ability to process financial data, perform calculations, and generate accurate analyses across various financial domains.

What is the Finance Agent leaderboard?

The Finance Agent leaderboard ranks 5 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Claude Opus 4.7 by Anthropic leads with a score of 0.644. The average score across all models is 0.609.

What is the highest Finance Agent score?

The highest Finance Agent score is 0.644, achieved by Claude Opus 4.7 from Anthropic.

How many models are evaluated on Finance Agent?

5 models have been evaluated on the Finance Agent benchmark, with 0 verified results and 5 self-reported results.

What categories does Finance Agent cover?

Finance Agent is categorized under finance, reasoning, and agents. The benchmark evaluates text models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all finance
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

finance
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
108 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

finance
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
89 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models