InfoVQAtest
InfoVQA test set with infographic images requiring joint reasoning over document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations with elementary reasoning and arithmetic skills
Kimi K2.5 from Moonshot AI currently leads the InfoVQAtest leaderboard with a score of 0.926 across 12 evaluated AI models.
What InfoVQAtest measures
InfoVQAtest is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 12 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.9, with the leader reaching 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- InfographicVQA
- Authors
- Minesh Mathew, Viraj Bagal, Rubèn Pérez Tito, Dimosthenis Karatzas, and 2 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2104.12756
Abstract
Infographics are documents designed to effectively communicate information using a combination of textual, graphical and visual elements. In this work, we explore the automatic understanding of infographic images by using Visual Question Answering technique.To this end, we present InfographicVQA, a new dataset that comprises a diverse collection of infographics along with natural language questions and answers annotations. The collected questions require methods to jointly reason over the document layout, textual content, graphical elements, and data visualizations. We curate the dataset with emphasis on questions that require elementary reasoning and basic arithmetic skills. Finally, we evaluate two strong baselines based on state of the art multi-modal VQA models, and establish baseline performance for the new task. The dataset, code and leaderboard will be made available at http://docvqa.org
Kimi K2.5 leads with 92.6%, followed by 
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking at 89.5% and Qwen3 VL 32B Thinking at 89.2%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on InfoVQAtest
InfoVQAtest Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 2 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.30 / $1.50 | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.18 / $2.09 | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.08 / $0.50 | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 |
FAQ
Common questions about InfoVQAtest.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.
CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.
MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.