MVBench
A comprehensive multi-modal video understanding benchmark covering 20 challenging video tasks that require temporal understanding beyond single-frame analysis. Tasks span from perception to cognition, including action recognition, temporal reasoning, spatial reasoning, object interaction, scene transition, and counterfactual inference. Uses a novel static-to-dynamic method to systematically generate video tasks from existing annotations.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the MVBench leaderboard with a score of 0.766 across 17 evaluated AI models.
What MVBench measures
MVBench is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, reasoning, spatial reasoning, video, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 17 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.8.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning, best AI for spatial reasoning, best AI for video and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- MVBench: A Comprehensive Multi-modal Video Understanding Benchmark
- Authors
- Kunchang Li, Yali Wang, Yinan He, Yizhuo Li, and 8 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2311.17005
Abstract
With the rapid development of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs), a number of diagnostic benchmarks have recently emerged to evaluate the comprehension capabilities of these models. However, most benchmarks predominantly assess spatial understanding in the static image tasks, while overlooking temporal understanding in the dynamic video tasks. To alleviate this issue, we introduce a comprehensive Multi-modal Video understanding Benchmark, namely MVBench, which covers 20 challenging video tasks that cannot be effectively solved with a single frame. Specifically, we first introduce a novel static-to-dynamic method to define these temporal-related tasks. By transforming various static tasks into dynamic ones, we enable the systematic generation of video tasks that require a broad spectrum of temporal skills, ranging from perception to cognition. Then, guided by the task definition, we automatically convert public video annotations into multiple-choice QA to evaluate each task. On one hand, such a distinct paradigm allows us to build MVBench efficiently, without much manual intervention. On the other hand, it guarantees evaluation fairness with ground-truth video annotations, avoiding the biased scoring of LLMs. Moreover, we further develop a robust video MLLM baseline, i.e., VideoChat2, by progressive multi-modal training with diverse instruction-tuning data. The extensive results on our MVBench reveal that, the existing MLLMs are far from satisfactory in temporal understanding, while our VideoChat2 largely surpasses these leading models by over 15% on MVBench. All models and data are available at https://github.com/OpenGVLab/Ask-Anything.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads with 76.6%, followed by
Qwen3.6-27B at 75.5% and
Qwen3.5-35B-A3B at 74.8%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on MVBench
MVBench Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | 262K | $0.40 / $3.20 | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | 262K | $0.25 / $2.00 | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 73B | — | — | ||
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 11 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 7B | — | — | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.18 / $2.09 | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 | ||
| 17 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.08 / $0.50 |
FAQ
Common questions about MVBench.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions