ODinW

Object Detection in the Wild (ODinW) benchmark for evaluating object detection models' task-level transfer ability across diverse real-world datasets in terms of prediction accuracy and adaptation efficiency

Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the ODinW leaderboard with a score of 0.518 across 15 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.6 Plus leads with 51.8%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.6-35B-A3B at 50.8% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct at 48.6%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ODinW

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

ODinW Leaderboard

15 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
1.0M$0.50 / $3.00
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
236B262K$0.30 / $1.50
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
4B262K$0.10 / $0.60
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
31B
6
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
33B
7
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
9B262K$0.08 / $0.50
8
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
9
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
236B262K$0.45 / $3.49
10
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
11
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
7B
12
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
31B
13
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
14
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
9B262K$0.18 / $2.09
15
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
4B262K$0.10 / $1.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about ODinW.

What is the ODinW benchmark?

Object Detection in the Wild (ODinW) benchmark for evaluating object detection models' task-level transfer ability across diverse real-world datasets in terms of prediction accuracy and adaptation efficiency

What is the ODinW leaderboard?

The ODinW leaderboard ranks 15 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3.6 Plus by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.518. The average score across all models is 0.449.

What is the highest ODinW score?

The highest ODinW score is 0.518, achieved by Qwen3.6 Plus from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on ODinW?

15 models have been evaluated on the ODinW benchmark, with 0 verified results and 15 self-reported results.

Where can I find the ODinW paper?

The ODinW paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2112.03857. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does ODinW cover?

ODinW is categorized under vision. The benchmark evaluates image models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all vision
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
74 models
MMMU

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

visionmultimodal
62 models
MMMU-Pro

A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.

visionmultimodal
48 models
MathVista

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

visionmultimodal
36 models
CharXiv-R

CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.

visionmultimodal
35 models
AI2D

AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.

visionmultimodal
32 models