PerceptionTest
A novel multimodal video benchmark designed to evaluate perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained models across video, audio, and text modalities. Contains 11.6k real-world videos (average 23 seconds) filmed by participants worldwide, densely annotated with six types of labels. Focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and reasoning types (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual). Shows significant performance gap between human baseline (91.4%) and state-of-the-art video QA models (46.2%).
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the PerceptionTest leaderboard with a score of 0.732 across 2 evaluated AI models.
What PerceptionTest measures
PerceptionTest is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, physics, reasoning, spatial reasoning, video, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for physics, best AI for reasoning, best AI for spatial reasoning, best AI for video and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- Perception Test: A Diagnostic Benchmark for Multimodal Video Models
- Authors
- Viorica Pătrăucean, Lucas Smaira, Ankush Gupta, Adrià Recasens Continente, and 20 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2305.13786
Abstract
We propose a novel multimodal video benchmark - the Perception Test - to evaluate the perception and reasoning skills of pre-trained multimodal models (e.g. Flamingo, SeViLA, or GPT-4). Compared to existing benchmarks that focus on computational tasks (e.g. classification, detection or tracking), the Perception Test focuses on skills (Memory, Abstraction, Physics, Semantics) and types of reasoning (descriptive, explanatory, predictive, counterfactual) across video, audio, and text modalities, to provide a comprehensive and efficient evaluation tool. The benchmark probes pre-trained models for their transfer capabilities, in a zero-shot / few-shot or limited finetuning regime. For these purposes, the Perception Test introduces 11.6k real-world videos, 23s average length, designed to show perceptually interesting situations, filmed by around 100 participants worldwide. The videos are densely annotated with six types of labels (multiple-choice and grounded video question-answers, object and point tracks, temporal action and sound segments), enabling both language and non-language evaluations. The fine-tuning and validation splits of the benchmark are publicly available (CC-BY license), in addition to a challenge server with a held-out test split. Human baseline results compared to state-of-the-art video QA models show a substantial gap in performance (91.4% vs 46.2%), suggesting that there is significant room for improvement in multimodal video understanding. Dataset, baseline code, and challenge server are available at https://github.com/deepmind/perception_test
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 73.2%, followed by
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct at 70.5%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on PerceptionTest
PerceptionTest Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about PerceptionTest.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions