The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

ProtocolQA Open-Ended

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on ProtocolQA Open-Ended

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

ProtocolQA Open-Ended Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1—500K$2.00 / $6.00
2——$5.00 / $25.00
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is ProtocolQA Open-Ended?

ProtocolQA Open-Ended evaluates free-form answers on troubleshooting failed experimental outcomes from common biological laboratory protocols. Kept separate from the multiple-choice ProtocolQA split.

ProtocolQA Open-Ended is a text benchmark evaluating models on safety and healthcare tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.5, with the leader at 0.7.

Compare leaders on the best AI for safety and best AI for healthcare leaderboards.

Current leaders

Grok 4.7 from xAI currently leads the ProtocolQA Open-Ended leaderboard with a score of 0.704 across 2 evaluated AI models.

1Grok 4.7xAI70.4%
2GPT-RosalindOpenAI36.4%

Source paper

Title
LAB-Bench: Measuring Capabilities of Language Models for Biology Research
Authors
Jon M. Laurent, Joseph D. Janizek, Michael Ruzo, Michaela M. Hinks, and 5 others
Published
Abstract

There is widespread optimism that frontier Large Language Models (LLMs) and LLM-augmented systems have the potential to rapidly accelerate scientific discovery across disciplines. Today, many benchmarks exist to measure LLM knowledge and reasoning on textbook-style science questions, but few if any benchmarks are designed to evaluate language model performance on practical tasks required for scientific research, such as literature search, protocol planning, and data analysis. As a step toward building such benchmarks, we introduce the Language Agent Biology Benchmark (LAB-Bench), a broad dataset of over 2,400 multiple choice questions for evaluating AI systems on a range of practical biology research capabilities, including recall and reasoning over literature, interpretation of figures, access and navigation of databases, and comprehension and manipulation of DNA and protein sequences. Importantly, in contrast to previous scientific benchmarks, we expect that an AI system that can achieve consistently high scores on the more difficult LAB-Bench tasks would serve as a useful assistant for researchers in areas such as literature search and molecular cloning. As an initial assessment of the emergent scientific task capabilities of frontier language models, we measure performance of several against our benchmark and report results compared to human expert biology researchers. We will continue to update and expand LAB-Bench over time, and expect it to serve as a useful tool in the development of automated research systems going forward. A public subset of LAB-Bench is available for use at the following URL: https://huggingface.co/datasets/futurehouse/lab-bench

FAQ

Common questions about the ProtocolQA Open-Ended benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the ProtocolQA Open-Ended benchmark?

ProtocolQA Open-Ended evaluates free-form answers on troubleshooting failed experimental outcomes from common biological laboratory protocols. Kept separate from the multiple-choice ProtocolQA split.

What is the ProtocolQA Open-Ended leaderboard?

The ProtocolQA Open-Ended leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Grok 4.7 by xAI leads with a score of 0.704. The average score across all models is 0.534.

What is the highest ProtocolQA Open-Ended score?

The highest ProtocolQA Open-Ended score is 0.704, achieved by Grok 4.7 from xAI.

How many models are evaluated on ProtocolQA Open-Ended?

2 models have been evaluated on the ProtocolQA Open-Ended benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the ProtocolQA Open-Ended paper?

The ProtocolQA Open-Ended paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10362. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does ProtocolQA Open-Ended cover?

ProtocolQA Open-Ended is categorized under safety and healthcare. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What's the difference between ProtocolQA Open-Ended and ProtocolQA?

ProtocolQA Open-Ended is a variant of ProtocolQA. See the ProtocolQA leaderboard for the broader benchmark and per-model comparison.

Which model offers the best value on ProtocolQA Open-Ended?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Grok 4.7 from xAI is the cheapest, at $2.00 per million input tokens with a score of 0.704.

How recent are the ProtocolQA Open-Ended leaderboard results?

The ProtocolQA Open-Ended leaderboard was last updated in October 2026 and currently includes 2 evaluated models.