RULER 128k

PaperImplementation

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on RULER 128k

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

RULER 128k Leaderboard

1 models
ContextCostLicense
19B
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is RULER 128k?

RULER 128k evaluates the official 13-task RULER v1 suite at a 131072-token context budget.

RULER 128k is a text benchmark evaluating models on long context and reasoning tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.9, with the leader at 0.9.

Compare leaders on the best AI for long context and best AI for reasoning leaderboards.

Current leaders

MiniCPM-SALA from OpenBMB currently leads the RULER 128k leaderboard with a score of 0.894 across 1 evaluated AI models.

1MiniCPM-SALAOpenBMB89.4%

Source paper

Title
RULER: What's the Real Context Size of Your Long-Context Language Models?
Authors
Cheng-Ping Hsieh, Simeng Sun, Samuel Kriman, Shantanu Acharya, and 4 others
Published
Abstract

The needle-in-a-haystack (NIAH) test, which examines the ability to retrieve a piece of information (the "needle") from long distractor texts (the "haystack"), has been widely adopted to evaluate long-context language models (LMs). However, this simple retrieval-based test is indicative of only a superficial form of long-context understanding. To provide a more comprehensive evaluation of long-context LMs, we create a new synthetic benchmark RULER with flexible configurations for customized sequence length and task complexity. RULER expands upon the vanilla NIAH test to encompass variations with diverse types and quantities of needles. Moreover, RULER introduces new task categories multi-hop tracing and aggregation to test behaviors beyond searching from context. We evaluate 17 long-context LMs with 13 representative tasks in RULER. Despite achieving nearly perfect accuracy in the vanilla NIAH test, almost all models exhibit large performance drops as the context length increases. While these models all claim context sizes of 32K tokens or greater, only half of them can maintain satisfactory performance at the length of 32K. Our analysis of Yi-34B, which supports context length of 200K, reveals large room for improvement as we increase input length and task complexity. We open source RULER to spur comprehensive evaluation of long-context LMs.

FAQ

Common questions about the RULER 128k benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the RULER 128k benchmark?

RULER 128k evaluates the official 13-task RULER v1 suite at a 131072-token context budget.

What is the RULER 128k leaderboard?

The RULER 128k leaderboard ranks 1 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, MiniCPM-SALA by OpenBMB leads with a score of 0.894. The average score across all models is 0.894.

What is the highest RULER 128k score?

The highest RULER 128k score is 0.894, achieved by MiniCPM-SALA from OpenBMB.

How many models are evaluated on RULER 128k?

1 models have been evaluated on the RULER 128k benchmark, with 0 verified results and 1 self-reported results.

Where can I find the RULER 128k paper?

The RULER 128k paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06654. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

Where can I find the RULER 128k dataset?

The RULER 128k dataset is available at https://github.com/NVIDIA/RULER.

What categories does RULER 128k cover?

RULER 128k is categorized under long context and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

What's the difference between RULER 128k and RULER?

RULER 128k is a variant of RULER. See the RULER leaderboard for the broader benchmark and per-model comparison.

What is the best open-source model on RULER 128k?

MiniCPM-SALA by OpenBMB is the top-ranked open-source model on RULER 128k, with a score of 0.894 (rank #1).

How recent are the RULER 128k leaderboard results?

The RULER 128k leaderboard was last updated in July 2026 and currently includes 1 evaluated models.