VideoMME w sub.

The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.

Qwen3.6-27B from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the VideoMME w sub. leaderboard with a score of 0.877 across 9 evaluated AI models.

Paper

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.6-27B leads with 87.7%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-122B-A10B at 87.3% and Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen3.5-27B at 87.0%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on VideoMME w sub.

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

VideoMME w sub. Leaderboard

9 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
28B262K$0.60 / $3.60
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
122B262K$0.40 / $3.20
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
27B262K$0.30 / $2.40
4
OpenAI
OpenAI
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B262K$0.25 / $2.00
5
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
35B
7
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
34B
8
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
7B
9
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
8B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about VideoMME w sub..

What is the VideoMME w sub. benchmark?

The first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video analysis. Features 900 videos (254 hours) with 2,700 question-answer pairs covering 6 primary visual domains and 30 subfields. Evaluates temporal understanding across short (11 seconds) to long (1 hour) videos with multi-modal inputs including video frames, subtitles, and audio.

What is the VideoMME w sub. leaderboard?

The VideoMME w sub. leaderboard ranks 9 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen3.6-27B by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.877. The average score across all models is 0.826.

What is the highest VideoMME w sub. score?

The highest VideoMME w sub. score is 0.877, achieved by Qwen3.6-27B from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on VideoMME w sub.?

9 models have been evaluated on the VideoMME w sub. benchmark, with 0 verified results and 9 self-reported results.

Where can I find the VideoMME w sub. paper?

The VideoMME w sub. paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.21075. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does VideoMME w sub. cover?

VideoMME w sub. is categorized under multimodal, video, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all multimodal
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

visionmultimodal
74 models
MMMU

MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.

multimodalmultimodal
62 models
MMMU-Pro

A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.

multimodalmultimodal
47 models
MathVista

MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.

multimodalmultimodal
36 models
CharXiv-R

CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.

multimodalmultimodal
34 models
AI2D

AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.

multimodalmultimodal
32 models