Best overall
ChatGPT
The deepest all-round consumer toolset.
Independent consumer comparison
We compare the products people actually use—not just the models underneath them. ChatGPT is our best overall pick, while Gemini, Perplexity, and Claude win distinct jobs.
By LLM Stats Research
The short answer
Editorial recommendations based on the measured model evidence and documented product features below; they are not standardized consumer-product scores.
Best overall
ChatGPT
The deepest all-round consumer toolset.
Best free
Gemini
The broadest useful free package.
Best research
Perplexity
Search and citations are the product, not an add-on.
Best writing
Claude
Controlled prose and excellent document handling.
Best coding
Claude
Strong code work inside a focused knowledge workflow.
Best privacy
Business plans
For sensitive work, use a no-training business tier—not a free consumer account.
Evidence snapshot 2026-08-27
These are real conservative TrueSkill index scores from the LLM Stats backend—not consumer-product test scores. Each mapping uses a representative vendor model and never claims that the consumer app routed to it.
Sorted by representative-model General rank
| Product / representative model | General | Search | Communication | Code | Long context | Vision | Tool calling |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChatGPT GPT-5.6 Sol | #157.23of 347 · 44g | #329.53of 81 · 1g | Not measured | #150.58of 248 · 16g | #232.35of 106 · 4g | #538.18of 199 · 7g | #334.30of 175 · 6g |
DeepSeek DeepSeek V4 Pro | #754.11of 347 · 10g | Not measured | Not measured | #744.24of 248 · 5g | Not measured | #1832.70of 199 · 1g | #633.59of 175 · 4g |
Claude Claude Opus 4.8 | #1051.73of 347 · 26g | #627.22of 81 · 2g | Not measured | #843.81of 248 · 10g | #2321.10of 106 · 2g | #637.22of 199 · 5g | #1131.07of 175 · 3g |
Meta AI Muse Spark 1.1 | #1251.03of 347 · 11g | Not measured | Not measured | #2337.31of 248 · 4g | Not measured | #935.91of 199 · 4g | #732.74of 175 · 3g |
Gemini Gemini 3.7 Flash | #1350.92of 347 · 14g | Not measured | Not measured | #1738.57of 248 · 4g | #133.73of 106 · 2g | #1334.22of 199 · 4g | #1528.75of 175 · 4g |
Grok Grok 4.6 | #1947.01of 347 · 7g | Not measured | Not measured | #1239.88of 248 · 3g | Not measured | Not measured | #5518.94of 175 · 1g |
Microsoft Copilot MAI-Thinking-1 | #8833.23of 347 · 17g | Not measured | #758.70of 106 · 1g | #8920.44of 248 · 3g | #2620.73of 106 · 2g | #1543.60of 199 · 1g | #11610.18of 175 · 2g |
Perplexity No single model mapping | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured | Not measured |
Each value is the category's conservative score μ − 3σ. Compare ranks within a column; do not average scores across categories.
“Not measured” is never converted to zero. The games count is visible because sparse results carry more uncertainty.
Memory, voice UX, native image creation, citation entailment, and recovery lack comparable product runs and are not scored.
Index snapshot retrieved 2026-08-27T23:42:00-04:00.
Feature matrix
“Excellent” means the feature is central and unusually well executed. Limits vary by plan, region, and demand. Feature cells were rechecked against the official sources linked in each review below.
| Product | Search | Citations | Files | Memory | Voice | Images | Integrations | Paid plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ChatGPT | Excellent | Yes | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Plus $20/month; Pro $200/month |
Claude | Yes | Yes | Excellent | Yes | Yes | Limited | Excellent | Pro $20/month or $17/month billed annually |
Gemini | Excellent | Yes | Excellent | Yes | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Google AI Pro $19.99/month |
Perplexity | Excellent | Excellent | Yes | Limited | Yes | Yes | Yes | Pro from $20/month |
Microsoft Copilot | Excellent | Yes | Yes | Yes | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | Microsoft 365 Personal from $9.99/month or $99.99/year |
Grok | Excellent | Yes | Yes | Limited | Excellent | Excellent | Yes | SuperGrok $30/month |
DeepSeek | Yes | Limited | Yes | No | No | No | No | No consumer subscription |
Meta AI | Yes | Limited | Limited | Yes | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | No consumer subscription |
Product reviews
#1 · Best overall
The most complete consumer AI product: excellent general answers, deep research, files, voice, images, memory, and a mature tool ecosystem in one interface.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — core chat, search, voice, files, and image tools with limits
Paid: Plus $20/month; Pro $200/month
Evidence record
Model indexes cover general capability, search, code, long context, vision, and tool calling. Product memory, voice, citation accuracy, and recovery are not measured comparably.
Representative OpenAI model in the LLM Stats index; this does not assert ChatGPT routing.
Conservative index · rank · games
· Official Plus, memory, voice, and data-control documentation rechecked.
#2 · Writing and coding
The best choice for thoughtful prose, document work, and sustained collaboration. Its clean answers and strong coding tools make it especially good for focused knowledge work.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — chat, web search, files, memory, code execution, and connectors with limits
Paid: Pro $20/month or $17/month billed annually
Evidence record
The selected model has general, search, code, long-context, vision, and tool-calling evidence. It has no communication-index observation in this snapshot, so writing remains not measured for this model.
Representative Anthropic model in the LLM Stats index; this does not assert Claude app routing.
Conservative index · rank · games
· Official Pro pricing, memory, voice, and incognito documentation rechecked.
#3 · Best free plan
The strongest free package for most people, with capable models, Deep Research, Gemini Live, image creation, and unusually useful connections to Google services.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — chat, Deep Research, Gemini Live, images, Canvas, and Gems with limits
Paid: Google AI Pro $19.99/month
Evidence record
The snapshot measures general, code, long context, vision, and tool calling. Search and communication are not present for this selected model.
Representative Google model in the LLM Stats index; consumer availability is separately sourced.
Conservative index · rank · games
· Official no-subscription limits, model availability, features, and privacy documentation rechecked.
#4 · Research and citations
The fastest path from a question to a source-backed answer. Choose it when web discovery, citation inspection, and follow-up research matter more than creative conversation.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — standard search, limited Pro Search, Research, and file uploads
Paid: Pro from $20/month
Evidence record
Perplexity routes across multiple models. Assigning one LLM Stats model or index score to the consumer product would be misleading, so model evidence is intentionally not mapped.
No honest single-model index mapping is available.
· Official search, citation, file, model-routing, pricing, and data-control documentation rechecked.
#5 · Microsoft 365 users
The practical pick when your work already lives in Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Edge, and Windows. The standalone chatbot is useful; the real advantage is integration.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — web-grounded chat, writing help, voice, and image creation
Paid: Microsoft 365 Personal from $9.99/month or $99.99/year
Evidence record
The snapshot contains general, communication, code, long-context, vision, and tool-calling evidence. It does not measure Microsoft 365 integration quality.
Representative Microsoft model in the LLM Stats index; Copilot can use other routing and integrations.
Conservative index · rank · games
· Official free-versus-Microsoft-365 feature boundaries and consumer privacy documentation rechecked.
#6 · Real-time X and web context
A fast, capable assistant with unusually direct access to live web and X context, plus strong voice and media creation. Best for trend-aware exploration, with extra care around source quality.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — real-time search, voice, connectors, and limited usage
Paid: SuperGrok $30/month
Evidence record
The snapshot contains general, code, and tool-calling evidence. Search, communication, long-context, and vision indexes are missing for this exact selected model.
Current model named in official Grok plan documentation and mapped to its LLM Stats record.
Conservative index · rank · games
· Official Grok 4.6 access, free limits, voice, files, connectors, generation, pricing, and privacy documentation rechecked.
#7 · Free reasoning
Exceptional model capability for a free product, especially for reasoning and technical questions. The consumer app is much thinner than the leading all-in-one assistants.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — no subscription; chat, reasoning mode, web search, and file extraction
Paid: No consumer subscription
Evidence record
The snapshot contains general, code, vision, and tool-calling evidence. Consumer memory, voice, images, and citation accuracy are not benchmarked.
Representative recent DeepSeek model in LLM Stats; the official consumer-app page does not establish identical routing.
Conservative index · rank · games
· Official consumer-app search, file extraction, free access, and privacy documentation rechecked.
#8 · Casual chat and social apps
The easiest assistant to use without changing habits because it is embedded across Meta’s apps. Great for casual questions, voice, and playful images; weaker for rigorous knowledge work.
Where it wins
Know before choosing
Free: Yes — consumer chat and creative tools are free
Paid: No consumer subscription
Evidence record
The snapshot contains general, code, vision, and tool-calling evidence. Muse Image and the consumer voice experience are documented features but are not scored by these text-model indexes.
Officially documented as powering Meta AI and mapped to its LLM Stats record.
Conservative index · rank · games
· Official Muse Spark 1.1, Muse Image, voice, and incognito documentation rechecked.
Model measurements and product documentation answer different questions. We publish both, keep them separate, and state what neither can prove. We do not publish hands-on product scores without saved, auditable runs.
Product features and US list prices were last rechecked on Aug 27, 2026. The index snapshot carries its own retrieval timestamp. We accept no affiliate commission for placement.
Index 01
Broad model capability
Conservative score μ − 3σ · rank · field size · games
Index 02
Research support—not product citation accuracy
Conservative score μ − 3σ · rank · field size · games
Index 03
Writing support
Conservative score μ − 3σ · rank · field size · games
Index 04
Coding support
Conservative score μ − 3σ · rank · field size · games
Index 05
Large-file reasoning—not upload UX
Conservative score μ − 3σ · rank · field size · games
Index 06
Image understanding—not image generation UX
Conservative score μ − 3σ · rank · field size · games
Index 07
Tool-use support—not product recovery UX
Conservative score μ − 3σ · rank · field size · games
Coverage gap
Product memory, voice UX, image creation, citation entailment, and recovery need recorded cross-product runs before scoring.
There is no universal “most private” free chatbot. Consumer settings, retention, training choices, and regional rules differ. For confidential work, use a business or enterprise plan that contractually excludes training, configure retention, and follow your organization’s data policy.
Plans and model routing change quickly. Representative models do not prove consumer-app routing, model indexes do not measure product UX, and documented feature availability does not prove quality. A source link is not proof that a generated claim is correct—open the source.
The technology underneath
Model scores inform our product verdicts, but they are not the verdict. Consumer products also differ in search, tools, memory, voice, files, limits, and privacy controls.
| Rank | Model | Organization | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Amazon | 32.22 | |
| 2 | Amazon | 30.64 | |
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 29.56 | |
| 4 | Amazon | 29.49 | |
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28.83 | |
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28.71 | |
| 7 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28.57 | |
| 8 | Meituan | 28.08 | |
| 9 | Anthropic | 28.06 | |
| 10 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27.95 |