The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Codestral-22B

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 0.0.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 0.0, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Codestral-22B

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Codestral-22B
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
0.0
#326
Reasoning
50.5
#12
-0.1
#318
Coding
36.2
#22
2.5
#225
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 7 for Codestral-22B

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Codestral-22Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

721.8B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 721.8B more parameters than Codestral-22B, making it 3251.4% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
22.2Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
22.2B
Codestral-22B

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Codestral-22B uses MNPL-0.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29.

Atria Dawn Preview is 28 months newer than Codestral-22B.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

3 days ago

2.3yr newer
Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

2.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Codestral-22B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Codestral-22B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Codestral-22B.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Codestral-22B?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 0.0. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Codestral-22B is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Codestral-22B in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Codestral-22B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 0.0), licensing (MIT vs MNPL-0.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Codestral-22B?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons