The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 52.3 and 43.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 52.3 and 43.0.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Atria Dawn Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
43.0
#44
Reasoning
50.5
#12
44.2
#35
Agents
38.8
#10
29.2
#37
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
—
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Tool use
31.1#12
20.4#58
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

1 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Tau3 Banking), while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is better at 0 benchmarks.

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

620.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 620.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 500.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
124.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash Fin specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Atria Dawn Preview is 0 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

4 days ago

1w newer
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 52.3 and 43.0. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 43.0), licensing (MIT vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons