The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Gemma 3 27B

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 8.3.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 8.3, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3 27B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.08/M input and $0.16/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Gemma 3 27B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
8.3
#280
Reasoning
50.5
#12
8.6
#271
Coding
36.2
#22
5.3
#199
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.08 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.16 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 27 for Gemma 3 27B

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3 27Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

717.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 717.0B more parameters than Gemma 3 27B, making it 2655.6% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Google
Gemma 3 27B
27.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
27.0B
Gemma 3 27B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3 27B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Gemma 3 27B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Sep 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Gemma 3 27B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12.

Atria Dawn Preview is 18 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

5 days ago

1.5yr newer
Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3 27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 27B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Gemma 3 27B.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Gemma 3 27B?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 8.3. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Gemma 3 27B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Gemma 3 27B in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Gemma 3 27B scores GSM8k: 95.9%, IFEval: 90.4%, MATH: 89.0%, HumanEval: 87.8%, BIG-Bench Hard: 87.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3 27B?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Gemma 3 27B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3 27B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 8.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Gemma 3 27B?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Gemma 3 27B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons