The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs GPT-Live-1

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview and GPT-Live-1 trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Atria Dawn Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose GPT-Live-1

  • you are already invested in the OpenAI ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 2 for GPT-Live-1

1 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Tau3 Banking), while GPT-Live-1 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

GPT-Live-1 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

GPT-Live-1 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-Live-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while GPT-Live-1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

GPT-Live-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while GPT-Live-1 was released on 2026-09-10.

Atria Dawn Preview is 0 month newer than GPT-Live-1.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

1d newer
GPT-Live-1

Sep 10, 2026

1 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-Live-1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-07-31, while Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-Live-1's training data extends to 2025-07-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Atria Dawn Preview's cutoff date.

Atria Dawn Preview

GPT-Live-1

Jul 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and GPT-Live-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
GPT-Live-1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs GPT-Live-1.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or GPT-Live-1?

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and GPT-Live-1 is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to GPT-Live-1 in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. GPT-Live-1 scores TAU3-Bench: 86.2%, Tau3 Banking: 32.0%.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and GPT-Live-1?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and GPT-Live-1?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and GPT-Live-1 is developed by OpenAI.