The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 23.8.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 23.8, ranking #10 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Atria Dawn Preview wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.9 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 30B

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.16/M input and $0.65/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
IBM
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.9
#10
23.8
#173
Reasoning
50.1
#12
21.5
#181
Coding
35.6
#29
9.2
#177
Agents
38.2
#10
7.1
#141
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
— / M
$0.16 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.65 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Tool use
28.3#17
6.8#144
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 18 for IBM Granite 4.2 30B

3 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 3 benchmarks (BFCL-V4, SWE-Bench Pro, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while IBM Granite 4.2 30B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

714.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 714.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 30B, making it 2380.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
30.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
30.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only IBM Granite 4.2 30B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only IBM Granite 4.2 30B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while IBM Granite 4.2 30B was released on 2026-08-25.

Atria Dawn Preview is 1 month newer than IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

2w newer
IBM Granite 4.2 30B

Aug 25, 2026

4 weeks ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.2 30B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.2 30B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs IBM Granite 4.2 30B.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 51.9 to 23.8. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to IBM Granite 4.2 30B in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. IBM Granite 4.2 30B scores RULER 64k: 90.0%, AIME 2025: 89.2%, HMMT25: 89.2%, RULER 128k: 81.4%, MMLU-Pro: 77.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and IBM Granite 4.2 30B supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.9 vs 23.8), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and IBM Granite 4.2 30B?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and IBM Granite 4.2 30B is developed by IBM.

Related comparisons