The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 40.6.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 40.6, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.1 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.1
#10
40.6
#57
Coding
35.8
#25
34.1
#35
Agents
38.6
#10
29.9
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

276.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 276.0B more parameters than Atria Dawn Preview, making it 37.1% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 0 month newer than Atria Dawn Preview.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.1 to 40.6. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.1 vs 40.6), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons