The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 36.4.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 36.4, ranking #10 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Atria Dawn Preview wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Ling 3.0 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
36.4
#77
Reasoning
50.5
#12
35.6
#79
Coding
36.2
#22
25.3
#69
Agents
38.8
#10
19.5
#63
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 8
0 of 8
Input price
— / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
—
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
Ling 3.0 Flash
Tool use
31.1#12
17.7#72
Research
36.1#1
16.8#33
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 19 for Ling 3.0 Flash

8 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 8 benchmarks (BFCL-V4, BrowseComp, GDPval-AA, SkillsBench, SWE-Bench Pro, Tau3 Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1, WideSearch), while Ling 3.0 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

620.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 620.0B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash, making it 500.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash
124.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
124.0B
Ling 3.0 Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ling 3.0 Flash specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Ling 3.0 Flash specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Ling 3.0 Flash was released on 2026-08-04.

Atria Dawn Preview is 1 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

4 days ago

1mo newer
Ling 3.0 Flash

Aug 4, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Ling 3.0 Flash.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 36.4. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Ling 3.0 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Ling 3.0 Flash in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Ling 3.0 Flash scores AIME 2026: 93.2%, Multi-IF: 87.7%, HMMT Feb 26: 87.0%, IMO-AnswerBench: 83.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 82.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 36.4), licensing (MIT vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons