The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs MiMo-V2-Pro

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 35.6.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 35.6, ranking #10 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Atria Dawn Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiMo-V2-Pro

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.00/M input and $3.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
MiMo-V2-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
35.6
#82
Reasoning
50.5
#12
37.5
#66
Coding
36.2
#22
25.9
#68
Agents
38.8
#10
17.3
#74
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$1.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Context window
—
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
MiMo-V2-Pro
Tool use
31.1#12
18.5#66
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 7 for MiMo-V2-Pro

1 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (DeepSearchQA), while MiMo-V2-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Atria Dawn Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

256.0B diff

MiMo-V2-Pro has 256.0B more parameters than Atria Dawn Preview, making it 34.4% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
1.0Tparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
1000.0B
MiMo-V2-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2-Pro specifies input context (1,000,000 tokens). Only MiMo-V2-Pro specifies output context (16,384 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2-Pro
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output16,384 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while MiMo-V2-Pro uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

MiMo-V2-Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while MiMo-V2-Pro was released on 2026-03-18.

Atria Dawn Preview is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2-Pro.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

5mo newer
MiMo-V2-Pro

Mar 18, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs MiMo-V2-Pro.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or MiMo-V2-Pro?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 35.6. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and MiMo-V2-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to MiMo-V2-Pro in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. MiMo-V2-Pro scores Tau2 Telecom: 96.8%, DeepSearchQA: 86.7%, PinchBench: 81.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 78.0%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 71.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 35.6), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and MiMo-V2-Pro?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and MiMo-V2-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons