The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 11.2.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 11.2, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Atria Dawn Preview
Shanghai AI Laboratory
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
52.3
#10
11.2
#259
Reasoning
50.5
#12
11.4
#254
Coding
36.2
#22
6.8
#188
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
—
131,100

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 4 for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

741.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 741.0B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 24700.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
3.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
3.0B
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies input context (131,100 tokens). Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (131,100 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Tue Sep 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Atria Dawn Preview does not.

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Atria Dawn Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

Atria Dawn Preview is 9 months newer than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

4 days ago

9mo newer
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 11.2. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 11.2), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons