The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 23.8.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the overall LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 23.8, ranking #10 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • overall performance matters — it scores 52.3 and ranks #10 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.15/M input and $1.50/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
52.3
#10
23.8
#172
50.5
#12
24.5
#155
38.8
#10
12.2
#103
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
— / M
$1.50 / M
Context window
65,536

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
31.1#12
11.2#116
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 23 for Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

No common benchmarks found

Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinkingdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

664.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 664.0B more parameters than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking, making it 830.0% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
80.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
80.0B
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies input context (65,536 tokens). Only Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking specifies output context (65,536 tokens).

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Input65,536 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Atria Dawn Preview is licensed under MIT, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Atria Dawn Preview

MIT

Open weights

Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking was released on 2025-09-10.

Atria Dawn Preview is 12 months newer than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.0yr newer
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking

Sep 10, 2025

1.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Atria Dawn Preview leads the LLM Stats Score 52.3 to 23.8. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking scores MMLU-Redux: 92.5%, IFEval: 88.9%, AIME 2025: 87.8%, WritingBench: 84.6%, MMLU-Pro: 82.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Atria Dawn Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking supports 66K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (52.3 vs 23.8), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.