The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Beam 1.0 vs DeepSeek VL2

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 2.5.

Reflection AI · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 2.5, ranking #46 overall.

Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.6
#46
2.5
#337
45.5
#37
-2.3
#355
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
129,280

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Beam 1.0
DeepSeek VL2
15.9#105
2.0#187
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 14 for DeepSeek VL2

No common benchmarks found

Beam 1.0 and DeepSeek VL2don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

474.3B diff

Beam 1.0 has 474.3B more parameters than DeepSeek VL2, making it 1756.7% larger.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
501.3Bparameters
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
27.0Bparameters
501.3B
Beam 1.0
27.0B
DeepSeek VL2

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to DeepSeek VL2's 129,280 tokens. Beam 1.0 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while DeepSeek VL2 is limited to 129,280 tokens.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek VL2 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.

DeepSeek VL2 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Beam 1.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while DeepSeek VL2 uses deepseek.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13.

Beam 1.0 is 22 months newer than DeepSeek VL2.

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

6 days ago

1.8yr newer
DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.9 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while DeepSeek VL2's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without DeepSeek VL2's cutoff date.

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

DeepSeek VL2

—

Provider Availability

Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate.

Beam 1.0

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
reflection logo
Unknown Organization

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and DeepSeek VL2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek VL2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs DeepSeek VL2.

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or DeepSeek VL2?

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 2.5. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to DeepSeek VL2 in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and DeepSeek VL2?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and DeepSeek VL2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 2.5), context window (1.0M vs 129K), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs deepseek). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and DeepSeek VL2?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek.