The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Beam 1.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 29.6.

Reflection AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 29.6, ranking #46 overall.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you are already invested in the NVIDIA ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.6
#46
29.6
#146
45.5
#37
28.9
#146
33.7
#39
14.4
#154
28.8
#53
11.9
#127
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
8 of 8
0 of 8
Input price
$0.40 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Beam 1.0
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
35.1#45
23.4#140
26.4#32
5.4#169
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

8 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 8 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, MCP Atlas, SciCode, Tau3 Banking, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

427.3B diff

Beam 1.0 has 427.3B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 577.4% larger.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
501.3Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
501.3B
Beam 1.0
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Beam 1.0 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Beam 1.0 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Beam 1.0

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Beam 1.0 is 0 month newer than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

1d newer
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a cutoff of 2026-05-01.

Beam 1.0 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) (2026-05-01).

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

1 mo newer
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 29.6. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 29.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.