Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 21.3. Beam 1.0 is 1.4x cheaper per token.
Reflection AI · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 21.3, ranking #46 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Beam 1.0 is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Beam 1.0
- overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Gemini 2.5 Flash
- you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 14 for Gemini 2.5 Flash
Beam 1.0 outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.
Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than Gemini 2.5 Flash ($2.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Gemini 2.5 Flash is more expensive than Beam 1.0.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Beam 1.0 is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemini 2.5 Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.
Gemini 2.5 Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Beam 1.0
Gemini 2.5 Flash
License
Usage and distribution terms
Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemini 2.5 Flash uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Gemini 2.5 Flash was released on 2025-05-20.
Beam 1.0 is 17 months newer than Gemini 2.5 Flash.
Oct 16, 2026
4 days ago
1.4yr newerMay 20, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Beam 1.0 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Gemini 2.5 Flash has a cutoff of 2025-01-31.
Beam 1.0 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 2.5 Flash (2025-01-31).
Jun 2026
1.4 yr newerJan 2025
Provider Availability
Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Gemini 2.5 Flash is available from DeepInfra, Google.
Beam 1.0
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Gemini 2.5 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash.