Beam 1.0 vs Gemma 3 27B
Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 7.8. Gemma 3 27B is 6.0x cheaper per token.
Reflection AI · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 7.8, ranking #46 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemma 3 27B is roughly 6.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Beam 1.0
- overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose Gemma 3 27B
- cost matters — it's about 6.0x cheaper per token
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 27 for Gemma 3 27B
Beam 1.0 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench), while Gemma 3 27B is better at 0 benchmarks.
Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.08/1M tokens).
For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 7.5x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.16/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Beam 1.0 is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Beam 1.0 has 474.3B more parameters than Gemma 3 27B, making it 1756.7% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Gemma 3 27B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Beam 1.0 does not.
Gemma 3 27B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Beam 1.0
Gemma 3 27B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Gemma 3 27B uses Gemma.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Gemma
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12.
Beam 1.0 is 19 months newer than Gemma 3 27B.
Oct 16, 2026
6 days ago
1.6yr newerMar 12, 2025
1.6 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemma 3 27B's cutoff date.
Jun 2026
—
Provider Availability
Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita.
Beam 1.0
Gemma 3 27B
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Gemma 3 27B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Gemma 3 27B.