Beam 1.0 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Beam 1.0 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 44.6 and 42.9 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 6.7x cheaper per token.

Reflection AI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.6 and 42.9.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 6.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
cost matters — it's about 6.7x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Better token value: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Core performance indexes

LLM Stats Score

44.6

#46 · 22 evals

Best

42.9

#59 · 5 evals

Reasoning

45.5

#37 · 19 evals

Best

44.7

#44 · 4 evals

Agents

28.8

#53 · 9 evals

Best

28.6

#54 · 5 evals

Cost, coverage & limits

Benchmark wins

0 of 1

1 of 1

Best

Input price

$0.40 / M

$0.06 / M

Best

Output price

$1.20 / M

$0.18 / M

Best

Context window

1,048,576

Best

262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared

Index

Beam 1.0

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Tool use

26.4#32 · 4 evals

20.7#65 · 2 evals

Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

1 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is better at 1 benchmark (Tau3 Banking).

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 6.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Beam 1.0 is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Beam 1.0

Input tokens$0.40

Output tokens$1.20

Best providerTogether

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Input tokens$0.06

Output tokens$0.18

Best providerDeepinfra

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

377.3B diff

Beam 1.0 has 377.3B more parameters than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin, making it 304.3% larger.

Beam 1.0

501.3Bparameters

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

124.0Bparameters

501.3B

Beam 1.0

124.0B

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Beam 1.0 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Beam 1.0

Input1,048,576 tokens

Output131,072 tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Input262,144 tokens

Output262,144 tokens

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Beam 1.0 is 1 month newer than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

4 days ago

1mo newer

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Beam 1.0's training data extends to 2026-06-30, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's cutoff date.

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

—

Provider Availability

Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

Beam 1.0

Together

Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

Unknown Organization

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Deepinfra

Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0

✓ Preferred

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Beam 1.0 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.6 and 42.9. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is Beam 1.0 cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 6.7x cheaper for input tokens. Beam 1.0 costs $0.40/M input and $1.20/M output via together. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 42.9), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.06/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Beam 1.0 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin