The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched at 46.0 and 43.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.7x cheaper per token.

DeepSeek · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 46.0 and 43.0.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is roughly 3.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

  • cost matters — it's about 3.7x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
DeepSeek
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
46.0
#27
43.0
#44
Reasoning
42.4
#44
44.2
#35
Agents
32.9
#25
29.2
#37
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.22 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$0.66 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Tool use
25.6#34
20.4#58
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp · 6 for Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Findon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs less

For input processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.22/1M tokens) is 3.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp ($0.66/1M tokens) is 3.7x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input tokens$0.22
Output tokens$0.66
Best providerDeepSeek
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin's 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is limited to 262,144 tokens.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output393,216 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Sun Sep 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash Fin does not.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp was released on 2026-08-21, while Ling 3.0 Flash Fin was released on 2026-09-03.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 0 month newer than DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

Aug 21, 2026

1 months ago

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Sep 3, 2026

2 weeks ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is available from DeepInfra.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.22/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.66/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.44/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.32/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin.

Which is better, DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 46.0 and 43.0. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is made by DeepSeek and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp compare to Ling 3.0 Flash Fin in benchmarks?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 83.9%, DSBench-Hard: 63.6%, DeepSWE: 59.3%, NL2Repo: 57.7%, ZEROBench: 35.0%. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores SpreadSheetBench-v1: 86.5%, Finance Agent v1.1: 69.2%, Finance Agent v2: 59.8%, Tau3 Banking: 41.0%, APEX-Agents: 29.2%.

Is DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 3.7x cheaper for input tokens. DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp costs $0.22/M input and $0.66/M output via deepseek. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (46.0 vs 43.0), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.22 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

DeepSeek-V4-Flash-Vision-Exp is developed by DeepSeek and Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons