The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Beam 1.0 vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 26.3. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 3.7x cheaper per token.

Reflection AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Beam 1.0 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 26.3, ranking #46 overall.

In the 9 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Beam 1.0 wins 9; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is roughly 3.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Beam 1.0 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Beam 1.0

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 9 of 9 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 3.7x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Beam 1.0
Reflection AI
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.6
#46
26.3
#175
Reasoning
45.5
#37
24.5
#178
Coding
33.7
#39
12.7
#162
Agents
28.8
#53
-0.8
#199
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
9 of 9
0 of 9
Input price
$0.40 / M
$0.09 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
1,048,576
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Beam 1.0
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Math
35.1#45
29.8#86
Tool use
26.4#32
2.3#190
Long context
29.5#5
11.6#67
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

22 reported for Beam 1.0 · 23 for Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

9 shared

Beam 1.0 outperforms in 9 benchmarks (AA-LCR, BrowseComp, GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, IFBench, LiveCodeBench, SciCode, SWE-bench Multilingual, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Beam 1.0 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Beam 1.0 ($0.40/1M tokens) is 4.7x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.09/1M tokens).

For output processing, Beam 1.0 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Beam 1.0 is more expensive than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 26 2026 • llm-stats.com
Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input tokens$0.40
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerTogether
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.09
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

381.3B diff

Beam 1.0 has 381.3B more parameters than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B), making it 317.8% larger.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
501.3Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
120.0Bparameters
501.3B
Beam 1.0
120.0B
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Beam 1.0 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Beam 1.0 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Reflection AI
Beam 1.0
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Beam 1.0 is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) uses NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement .

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Beam 1.0

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Beam 1.0 was released on 2026-10-16, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) was released on 2026-03-11.

Beam 1.0 is 7 months newer than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).

Beam 1.0

Oct 16, 2026

1 weeks ago

7mo newer
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Mar 11, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Beam 1.0 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-30, while Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) has a cutoff of 2025-06-01.

Beam 1.0 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-30), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) (2025-06-01).

Beam 1.0

Jun 2026

1 yr newer
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

Jun 2025

Provider Availability

Beam 1.0 is available from Together, Reflection AI. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Beam 1.0

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
reflection logo
Unknown Organization

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.09/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Beam 1.0
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Beam 1.0 vs Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B).

Which is better, Beam 1.0 or Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Beam 1.0 leads the LLM Stats Score 44.6 to 26.3. Beam 1.0 is made by Reflection AI and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Beam 1.0 compare to Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Beam 1.0 scores AIME 2026: 97.7%, GPQA: 90.6%, LiveCodeBench: 88.3%, SWE-Bench Verified: 81.6%, MCP Atlas: 80.8%. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) scores HMMT 2025: 94.7%, RULER: 91.8%, AIME 2025: 90.2%, WMT24++: 86.7%, MMLU-Pro: 83.7%.

Is Beam 1.0 cheaper than Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is 4.7x cheaper for input tokens. Beam 1.0 costs $0.40/M input and $1.20/M output via together. Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) costs $0.09/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Beam 1.0 supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.6 vs 26.3), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.40 vs $0.09/M), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs NVIDIA Open Model License Agreement ). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Beam 1.0 and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B)?

Beam 1.0 is developed by Reflection AI and Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons